Representation You Can Trust Guiding Clients for Nearly 30 Years

Court Disallows Drugs Found In Warrantless Search

The decision was a victory for individual privacy rights which the state Supreme Court has been expanding in recent years.

Drug evidence seized by state troopers during a traffic stop in Lackawanna County is inadmissible, the state Superior Court ruled in a decision that explores how far police may go in warrantless searches of automobiles.

A panel of judges ruled that 78 grams of marijuana found in a car engine cannot be used as evidence in the case.

The decision was a victory for individual privacy rights, which the state Supreme Court has been expanding in recent years.

The Superior Court judges ruled police need a warrant before they can search all areas of a car unless there is both probable cause and immediate action, such as a public safety concern or the chance the suspect might flee or destroy criminal evidence.

In making its decision, the appeals court looked at what constitutes probable cause and urgent circumstances.

The defendant’s attorney, Patrick M. Rogan, had requested the evidence be suppressed, and the judge granted the motion

The Assistant District Attorney appealed, argued there was sufficient probable cause that the car contained evidence, therefore making a warrantless search valid. The prosecution also raised the possibility that weapons might have been in the vehicle and that traffic in the area posed a safety concern.

The case involves a traffic stop March 31, 1995, on Interstate 81. The state trooper pulled over a dilapidated car after he saw it changing lanes and, as he approached the vehicle, noticed a strong smell of marijuana. The trooper called for backup while questioning the driver and the passenger.

When backup arrived, officers patted down the men and found what was believed to be a marijuana seed in the defendant’s pocket. The men were handcuffed and were told the officers were going to search the car.
After the troopers found the 78 grams of marijuana, in one gram bags, in the air ducts in the engine compartment, they charged the men with having drugs for sale, drug possession, criminal conspiracy and possession of drug paraphernalia.

Attorney Rogan had questioned whether the marijuana odor and seed were probable cause to obtain a warrant to search the entire car if one had been sought. The Assistant District Attorney had contented a magistrate would have authorized police to act.

But the Superior Court judges found nothing to indicate any urgent circumstances requiring a warrantless search. The troopers had control of the vehicle and the suspects were handcuffed and moved away from the car, the opinion said. Troopers also had found no contraband in the trunk or passenger compartments.
“Therefore, even though probable cause existed, a warrantless search of the vehicle was unreasonable,” the panel wrote.

The court also specifically addressed the prosecution’s argument that traffic posed a safety concern and made a warrantless search necessary. Under the scenario, the judges said, any car that is stopped on the side of a busy highway would be subject to a full search.

“We are not willing to create such a rule,” they wrote.

The Scranton Times, June 21, 1997

Gavel

Highly Recommended by Our Clients

  • “Attorney Rogan has both the intellect and vigor to litigate when necessary and also the wisdom to know when to suggest that compromise and negotiation may be the more appropriate plan of action.”

    M.V.C.

  • “Excellent lawyer who kept me very well informed and worked hard to achieve a very satisfactory resolution to my case.”

    R.M.

  • “Thank you for your generosity.”

    M.D.

  • “You have went above and beyond what any lawyer would do for a client.”

    E.V.

  • “You handled everything with professional expertise. We are indebted to you.”

    G.H.

  • “We all really appreciate everything you've done for us. We’ll be forever grateful.”

    The T. Family

  • “Mr. Rogan was very professional and helpful.This is an excellent law firm who I would recommend to anyone in the PA area.”

    Austin

  • “They were very friendly and made us feel we were not just another case and were personally involved with our outcome.”

    C.C.

  • “I made a stupid mistake and you prevented it from ruining my life and career. You were always on top of the case and one step ahead.”

    J.

  • “Thank you from the bottom of our hearts for all you did for us.”

    N.A. & M.E.A.

  • “I can’t put into words how grateful I am for the outcome of my case. Thank you for all the extra help.”

    J.P.

  • “Your professionalism and obvious talent did much to relieve the anxiety and get us through such an outrageous ordeal.”

    P.T.

  • “Your win made my retirement possible!”

    S.K.

  • “If it wasn't for your kindness and for your help I would never be able to watch my baby grow up.”

    D.L.

  • “There isn’t a day that goes by that I don’t think of how helpful you were in my situation and how grateful I am you took the time to see me for the person I am.”

    J.P.

Get the Team at Rogan Law On Your Side Now

We've Been Helping Clients Fight Criminal Charges for Nearly 30 Years
  1. We Are Available to You 24/7
  2. Legal Services Available in English & Spanish
  3. All Initial Case Consultations Are Free
  4. Our Attorney Has Nearly 30 Years of Experience
Request Your Free Case Consultation
  • Please enter your name.
  • This isn't a valid email address.
    Please enter your email address.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
    Please enter your phone number.
    You entered an invalid number.
  • Please select an option.
  • Please enter a message.